Author Topic: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client  (Read 10559 times)

slackin

  • PUGBOT CREATOR
  • Head Admins
  • PUGBOT User
  • ****
  • Posts: 549
    • MSN Messenger - slackin@live.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • View Profile
    • PUGBOT Homepage
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #40 on: September 13, 2011, 01:25:30 am »
Can you make it so that it uses the virtual store folder (like the stock client) or the roaming profile folder in AppData (like mitsu's client) for post-WinXP users? The SACC client only seems to be able to access the q3ut4 folder within Program Files, which is non-ideal for WinVista and Win7.

yes I will fix that AFTER i get mitsu build done, that will be my next step, its actually quiet easy fix, just forgot to do it. The original source from FS doesn't have it patched, I will patch it for the next version. The mitsu source has this patch already, and I *think* the bumpy source does too. I'll have the two other clients done soon enough ;]

flajeen

  • EU Admin
  • PUGBOT User
  • **
  • Posts: 217
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #41 on: September 13, 2011, 08:30:58 am »
I have some issues with FPS. Isn't there a SSE2 build?

slackin

  • PUGBOT CREATOR
  • Head Admins
  • PUGBOT User
  • ****
  • Posts: 549
    • MSN Messenger - slackin@live.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • View Profile
    • PUGBOT Homepage
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #42 on: September 13, 2011, 10:51:57 pm »
I have some issues with FPS. Isn't there a SSE2 build?

which build are you using? the new one or are you referring to the old one? The new one should be damn near identical to stock iourt with the only exception being my network settings, lemme know

flajeen

  • EU Admin
  • PUGBOT User
  • **
  • Posts: 217
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #43 on: September 14, 2011, 07:04:41 am »
New one. Btw, it's good now.

Oh?!

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #44 on: September 14, 2011, 01:06:17 pm »
Rebuild + SACC = Epic win.

SmeXy

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Im so SmeXy
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #45 on: September 21, 2011, 06:57:06 pm »
nice

soullostMX

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #46 on: October 04, 2011, 04:49:23 pm »
Hi slackin, the last build doesn't work with my binds (mouse buttons mouse4, mouse5). That's bad :(, you can fix that?

beef

  • NA Admin
  • PUGBOT User
  • **
  • Posts: 52
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #47 on: October 09, 2011, 10:51:15 pm »
whatever happened to the ikal build you were doing of this?

don

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 448
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #48 on: October 10, 2011, 01:14:22 am »
ikal sucks.:/ u should try to make a version that doesn't store anything in virtual memory.

slackin

  • PUGBOT CREATOR
  • Head Admins
  • PUGBOT User
  • ****
  • Posts: 549
    • MSN Messenger - slackin@live.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • View Profile
    • PUGBOT Homepage
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #49 on: October 10, 2011, 09:16:54 pm »
ikal sucks.:/ u should try to make a version that doesn't store anything in virtual memory.

Don't use virtual memory, I have it turned off on my system.

don

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 448
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #50 on: October 10, 2011, 10:41:24 pm »
Meh might get 2 more sticks and do 16gb + no virtual.

rjc862003

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #51 on: October 11, 2011, 02:46:17 pm »
turning the page-file completely-OFF on win32 is not a good thing todo I am unsure why people still recommend it after as it has virtually no impact on anything if you have _available_ memory
there are only a few cases where something is paged to the page file
a: its a low priority object and won't be needed right away / or be affected by the slower access of the fixed disk
b: it gets put into the page file for swapping at a later date because its not needed atm
c: you are out of _available ram and windows needs some-ware to page it to until some becomes available_

ignore the above if god forbid you are still on xp^
I always maintain a AT Least a 1GB page file even on systems with 8GB+ of ram there are quiet a few cases of oddball software that refuses to work properly with it completely disabled

and while slacks leet net patchs are leet its still based on a gawd awfull old build of ioquake iirc he was messing with gento to setup a *32 build environment because midsus make files are fubar

don

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 448
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #52 on: October 11, 2011, 08:45:35 pm »
If it's a matter of compatibility, make a RAM disk and put the page file on that.

I have always been leery of turning the page file off since I think a lot of apps are horrible about memory management and take like 500MB for some shit you run in the background (Winamp, for example). It would be nice to be able to force certain apps to not use virtual RAM, since I think it's overall not a bad feature, but some apps (games, mostly) are not handled well. I wonder if disabling the page file even does anything, or Windows thinks "no page file? completely unload this!" At least the page file is near the edge of the disk in an uninterrupted block, so it doesn't get fragmented. I assume that's the case anyway, since it doesn't get dynamically resized. However, I notice that mine increased in size when I added more RAM, so it's probably been expanded into an area of my OS drive which sees heavy usage. Next thing I'm getting is an SSD.:/

rjc862003

  • PUGBOT User
  • *
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #53 on: October 11, 2011, 09:58:40 pm »
its very likely UNpossible to create a ramdisk and put the page file on since the ram drive needs to be created > mounted and the page file needs to be initialized on boot up
TBH there is really zero practical performance gain on modern systems with 8GB+ of ram with the page file disabled on w7 is fairly adept at memory management XP how ever is a stinking pile of shit and does naughty things with paging ...
also if you want a decent looking winamp'esq AUDIO player try AIMP 3 http://www.aimp.ru
also you can lock the pagefile to a certain size http://cl.ly/Arrl
and moving the page file to a SSD will really only give you a boost if there is excessive paging going down

tl;Dr set it to 1-2GB and forget it =/
« Last Edit: October 11, 2011, 10:04:01 pm by attackxie »

TheRick

  • Co-creator and owner!
  • Head Admins
  • PUGBOT User
  • ****
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #54 on: October 12, 2011, 04:38:38 pm »
You are not special.

flajeen

  • EU Admin
  • PUGBOT User
  • **
  • Posts: 217
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #55 on: October 13, 2011, 07:39:07 am »
DAT GUY UZEZ PICZ TO CUMUNICATE

seriously?

TheRick

  • Co-creator and owner!
  • Head Admins
  • PUGBOT User
  • ****
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #56 on: October 13, 2011, 02:18:07 pm »
ME?

You are not special.

slackin

  • PUGBOT CREATOR
  • Head Admins
  • PUGBOT User
  • ****
  • Posts: 549
    • MSN Messenger - slackin@live.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • View Profile
    • PUGBOT Homepage
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #57 on: October 13, 2011, 04:23:49 pm »
lmfao

beef

  • NA Admin
  • PUGBOT User
  • **
  • Posts: 52
    • View Profile
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #58 on: October 13, 2011, 06:11:26 pm »
so the ikal version of sacc?

is it gonna happen or not?

:D

slackin

  • PUGBOT CREATOR
  • Head Admins
  • PUGBOT User
  • ****
  • Posts: 549
    • MSN Messenger - slackin@live.com
    • AOL Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - slackin35
    • View Profile
    • PUGBOT Homepage
    • Email
Re: SACC - Slackin's Advanced Competitive Client
« Reply #59 on: October 14, 2011, 07:35:19 am »
Nope, not gonna happen. Mitsubishi's code is fucking shit ass shit thats setup like ass and won't compile right. Never will I try that again, I wasted a good 12 hours of my life on it to get it compiled to not run. Fuck that shit. I'll give anyone who wants the source and they can try for themselves, but I'm done. Play with a standard urt client which is better anyway. All those builds suck, seriously.

NOTE: Argue with me, comment about it in a way I dont like, or do anything to piss me off related to this, I'm just gonna fucking ban you. I don't EVER wanna hear about ikal, mitsubishis build or any of that crap ever again.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2011, 07:36:53 am by slackin »